<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ZoomIn website as a graph part ii</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.projectxtech.com/2008/06/10/zoomin-website-as-a-graph-part-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.projectxtech.com/2008/06/10/zoomin-website-as-a-graph-part-ii/</link>
	<description>Start-ups, Maps and Local Search in New Zealand</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://blog.projectxtech.com/2008/06/10/zoomin-website-as-a-graph-part-ii/#comment-1277</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.projectxtech.com/?p=581#comment-1277</guid>
		<description>This is a graph of the links coming from our Homepage. Its a better graph, because it pathways into our content have been created.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a graph of the links coming from our Homepage. Its a better graph, because it pathways into our content have been created.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Holmes</title>
		<link>http://blog.projectxtech.com/2008/06/10/zoomin-website-as-a-graph-part-ii/#comment-1274</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Holmes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 21:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.projectxtech.com/?p=581#comment-1274</guid>
		<description>I assume this is a graph of the ZoomIn homepage? I don't get why you have such a seemingly complex graph from such a simple, lightweight page? And of course the big question - is this graph a better graph than the previous one..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume this is a graph of the ZoomIn homepage? I don&#8217;t get why you have such a seemingly complex graph from such a simple, lightweight page? And of course the big question - is this graph a better graph than the previous one..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
