<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Application scaling and memcache</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.projectxtech.com/2007/09/17/application-scaling-and-memcache/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.projectxtech.com/2007/09/17/application-scaling-and-memcache/</link>
	<description>Start-ups, Maps and Local Search in New Zealand</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 04:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Preece</title>
		<link>http://blog.projectxtech.com/2007/09/17/application-scaling-and-memcache/#comment-932</link>
		<dc:creator>David Preece</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 23:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.projectxtech.com/2007/09/17/application-scaling-and-memcache/#comment-932</guid>
		<description>Django also recently sprouted a built in way to store session data in memcache instead of hitting the database even harder (http://code.djangoproject.com/changeset/6333). It appears to be merely a case of putting "SESSION_ENGINE=django.contrib.sessions.backends.cache" in settings.py. And setting up memcache, obviously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Django also recently sprouted a built in way to store session data in memcache instead of hitting the database even harder (http://code.djangoproject.com/changeset/6333). It appears to be merely a case of putting &#8220;SESSION_ENGINE=django.contrib.sessions.backends.cache&#8221; in settings.py. And setting up memcache, obviously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Judd</title>
		<link>http://blog.projectxtech.com/2007/09/17/application-scaling-and-memcache/#comment-928</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Judd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 04:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.projectxtech.com/2007/09/17/application-scaling-and-memcache/#comment-928</guid>
		<description>You may find this interesting, if you haven't read it already: http://koziarski.net/archives/2007/5/28/clever-caching . Get your keys right and the rest follows.

My first instinct is to cache from the user end back. The less deep into the stack the request has to go, the better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may find this interesting, if you haven&#8217;t read it already: <a href="http://koziarski.net/archives/2007/5/28/clever-caching" rel="nofollow">http://koziarski.net/archives/2007/5/28/clever-caching</a> . Get your keys right and the rest follows.</p>
<p>My first instinct is to cache from the user end back. The less deep into the stack the request has to go, the better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
